- What a Difference a Decade Makes - NOT!!
Why Can't the Thoroughbred Racing Industry in
B.C. Get On Track
Those of you getting a little long in the tooth will remember
10 years ago when Jack Diamond and the B.C. Jockey Club
were being held up as the villains in the industry. `Everything
will be fine if we just get rid of Jack Diamond and let
the industry manage itself !!' 10 years later, industry
representatives are running Hastings Park, attendance is
down, handle is down, and it is only a short time before
purses will be down.
How can things have gone so wrong? Does the blame now lie
with the new managers? No, Jack Diamond is a well respected
and benevolent man. The current management group are equally
well intentioned. So why can't the racing industry get on
track instead of apparently fading away without a whimper?
I believe there are 2 fundamental problems with the management
of horse racing and 1 fundamental problem with the industry
itself.
First the management of the industry. Regardless of who
is running the PRA (Hastings Park), the CTHS or the HBPA,
the industry will not move forward until someone has the
responsibility, the authority and the will to do so. One
cannot put 3 groups, with naturally competing interests,
in a room and expect them to come up with the best solution
for the industry as a whole. Each representative is only
accountable to his or her group. The strongest group or
individual will dominate and most times the industry as
a whole will lose. The industry needs someone that, is accountable
for, and has the power to arbitrate between the horsemen,
the breeders and the track under the sole mandate of
expanding the size and scope of live horse racing throughout
the province. Until this happens horse racing will operate
like a ship with no captain - ultimately heading for the
rocks while the 3 first mates point fingers at each other.
Secondly, thoroughbred horse racing, as old as it is in
this province, has not weaned itself from outside support
and as a result continues to blame outside forces for it's
problems and look to outside sources for solutions. For
decades racing was protected by being the only form of legalized
gambling. Once the industry lost that protection, live racing
did not venture out and compete in the entertainment and
gaming industry on it's own merits. No, it turned to teletheatre,
simulcast and off track betting to provide support. Now
with the benefits of simulcast and teletheatre tapped out
it is again looking for outside support to protect it from
having to compete on it's own merits - bring on slot machines.
The thoroughbred racing industry in B.C. will not return
to any form of prominence unless and until it can compete
for entertainment and gambling revenues on it's own merit.
Why is the industry itself a problem? Mostly because it
doesn't recognize how out of touch it has become with the
expectations of today's business and society. This isolation
has contributed to a culture that is out of step with both
modern business practices and modern social values. Race
horse owners support live racing but are not always treated
with the respect and value required of successful businesses
in today's economic climate. Employees are often not afforded
the basic labour standards accepted in today's society.
There are many other entertainment businesses eager to treat
these customers properly and capture some of their entertainment
money.
- The fence around the backstretch is no longer effective
in just
keeping the seedy elements of society out of racing - it
has become
a way of keeping the progressive elements of society out
of racing.
Without substantial changes to the culture on the backstretch,
the supply of horses (read owners) for live horse racing
will dry up, not because people don't enjoy owning, watching
and betting on horse races, but because society (through
owners) will not continue to support the current culture
and business practices on the backstretch.
Enough of what's wrong! So what can the industry
do? Lets start with management. First, somebody or some
authority needs to be made responsible and accountable for
growth and development of horse racing in B.C. Historically
the commission's role has been regulatory and the structure
of the commission is designed to address the regulatory
aspects of the industry. Rather than create a new authority
over racing, the quickest and easiest way to change the
focus of the management of racing to a focus on growth and
development, is to change the management of the commission
by adding a Director of Growth and Development to compliment
a Director of Regulatory Services. The commission can pass
on the authority to the Director of Growth and Development
to enable that position to arbitrate contested issues between
the 3 industry groups and to initiate new programs to modernize
and stimulate the industry. This initiative is inexpensive
( can be done within the current commission budget) and
can be implemented quickly.
Live racing supports 4 times the jobs and economic activity
as electronic racing. Second, through discussion with all
sectors of the industry in all areas of the province, develop
a "Strategy for Expanding Live Racing in B.C."
and give the new Director of Growth and Development the
responsibility of implementing it. Live racing must aggressively
compete in the entertainment and gambling industries. It
must do so on it's own merits and not live off handouts
from others. If managed in a manner consistent with it's
competitors, I believe it can compete successfully.
Third, if you would like to see change in the backstretch
culture speak out. Demand that the commission expect as
much from backstretch employers and employees as society
expects in other businesses. Most professions require their
members to attend professional development activities each
year - why not horse trainers? When you rent a car, hire
a financial adviser or buy a computer, you sign a contract
outlining the terms and conditions of the business arrangement
- why not for training horses. Whether you work for McDonalds,
a local clothing store or a legal firm in the Bentall Center,
there is a dress code that is appropriate for the situation
- why not on the backstretch and in the paddock? There are
many things that could be done - only the mandate, desire
and authority to get them done are lacking. A Drector of
Growth and Development, with the appropriate authority,
could make these things happen.
A number of years ago someone suggested to me that the industry
may have to sink a lot lower before anything gets done.
He has been right so far. Let's hope he doesn't continue
to be right.
Mark Robbins
|